few days ago was added to the area Mr Peter NIŠPONSKÉHO congratulatory picture with commentary, in which the Communists on behalf of the Slovak Republic is grateful for the "example of the struggle for ideas and the communist Workers World Movement "and wishes to life and success" in the fight against global imperialism "and" in development socialism. "This article is not renewed confrontation attitudes RKS discussing the views of members of the Communist Party, but the summary presented RKS attitudes on the issue of Lukashenko's alleged struggle for communist ideas and the development of socialism. sentient current and recent-past events around the foreign policy of Belarus, must also be politically illiterate clear what the imperialists are interested in deposing Lukashenko and that this constitutes a strong point of resistance against Western policy response. To say, however, that is an example of the struggle for global ideas workers' and communist movement and that is building socialism in Belarus, is a little strong coffee.
If we think scientifically correct, we must distinguish between the building of socialism and the struggle against imperialism, what are the different categories of Marxist-Leninist theory. A Lukashenko in the eyes of Marxist-leninovcov stand solely in terms of the second criterion, like China, North Korea or Venezuela, in none of which actually is not socialism. The fact that the economy bears some socialist elements and also the fact that an important points of the anti-imperialist resistance movements can result in inappropriate conclusion that these works of socialist establishment.
In the evaluation of the axis better - worse somehow naturally offers the argument that these regimes are still better than Western capitalism. And while it is true that those points of resistance may be the defeat of world imperialism in terms of strategic importance, and that they reigning mostly state-capitalist regimes seek to concentrate economic power into one (although in principle neproletárskych hands), which may be advantageous in the later taking control of it by the working class. It is however necessary in the same breath added that capitalism is for poor proletarian vždy and that the strategic goal of the Communists in capitalist society must be the definitive elimination of the production relations based on exploitation of paid labor.
Looking for Belarus must therefore be commended antiimperializmus Minsk but certainly it is not necessary to issue Lukashenko regime for what it is - for socialism. That while clearly defining classics of Marxism-Leninism on the establishment and implementation of the dictatorship of the proletariat. This is in Belarus and the working class has no control over the means of production nor the state apparatus, which controls a significant part of their manufacturing facilities in the country.
It is true that the Lukashenko regime largely steadfastly resists efforts to control the Belarusian economy by foreign investors. The distinction of capitalist and socialist countries, however, the presence of functional kolkhoz and the fact that most of the industry is in state hands, the Belarus dictatorship of the proletariat does. does not make them or s. GAĽOM mentioned the fact that Lukashenko was the only post-Soviet leader against the collapse of the USSR. Only in the coming year plans MINSK get six and five hundred million U.S. dollars of foreign direct investment and to sell state assets at $ 3,000,000,000. Despite his diligent efforts, however, operates in Belarus privatizérov significant number of domestic and foreign investors from Russia, Poland and the Baltic States and the bureaucracy of state control over a significant part of the economy makes it the most state-capitalist power.
Under various scenarios related color revolutions of workshops American Congress and the CIA have been spliced, a number of regimes in Central and Eastern Europe. Eg. Splicing in the manner of Vladimir Meciar and methods attempts to overthrow the Lukashenko names were chosen scenarios "MEČIAR - MILOCHEVIC" and "Lukashenko" Brzezinski plan for Ukraine. In MINSK mode while resisting long as the relative social welfare for the bulk of the population and preserving state control over a significant part of the means of production. State is not socialist, but state-capitalist, and the recent establishment in Serbia, Ukraine and Slovakia marked the relatively high (although lower) level of control over the economy, which most irritated Western reaction to get its economic domination of the area.
as possible to discuss. whether the tactical role of the communist forces in the time it was against nepodrývať government MEČIAR SDK, SMK, SDL. It can not thank Meciar, Kuchma nor whether Milosevic and Lukashenko for the implementation of communist ideas and the struggle for socialism. For communist capitalist establishment is unacceptable as such and to must be undermining the capitalist system, which can only be decided between tactically advantageous and less effective way of weakening his power.
is true, as stated p. GAĽA the system in Belarus exposed to attack of both the capitalist West as well as by capitalist Russia, and that given the economic opportunities of a small country or can not be entirely possible now to build socialism in the momentary conditions. Therefore, as supplied, will be the establishment of the socialist establishment of "about to overthrow capitalism in Russia itself and the best re-restore the USSR".
Lukashenko of Belarus supports the only party with the attribute "kumunistická" in its name and only the ideological successor of the Communist Party of Belarus - the Communist Party of the USSR (KPB - CPSS) Communist Party of Belarus (KPB). KPB legal successor - KPSS functioning within the fragmented opposition Belarusian Party of Belarus under the name United Left "just world" (by 2009 Communist Party of Belarus) takes the deeply revisionist, right-wing opportunist Eurocommunist and opinions. However, it is possible Lukashenko in his approach to the communist movement blamed for anything.
negative is unquestionably the role of PKB in the collapse, in 1993 pohltivšej original Communist Party of Belarus SSR. The collapse occurred in 1996 under the baton of Lukashenko's people, who caused a schism in it and play a role in the discredited those who did not subject scripted subjecting the Belarusian Communist Movement official Minsk. Page KPB, which was controlled from this split, is designed systemically as subordinate and obedient people Lukashenko organization whose current goal is not to change the capitalist social order of the socialist, but in fact maintain social-democratic government of Lukashenko.
Let's leave aside the fact that part of the Communists may be adopted objectives temporary support system for tactical reasons and vychádzajme of being a communist for "indecent hide their views and intentions ", which is undoubtedly ranks overthrow whole capitalist system, including the Lukashenko regime. By contrast, KPB, which is currently waived the target, PKB is (today "Spravedlivyj mir"), which until recently was to "achieve full liberation from exploitation in all its forms and building a classless society". Today, unfortunately, the party led by its longtime chairman KAĽAKINA under the influence of the West presents a systemically acceptable Eurocommunist opinions, which can not be equated no good communist.
It is clear that if it wants an organization that refused to submit the reporting scheme games, in terms of the Belarusian state to survive, it must connect the "companions of the devil". For tactical reasons, it is the case, it made such a decision, often even necessary. Eg. AKM , by s. VOCHYÁNA "the best organization in Russia", is integrated in the bodies of "Other Russia", which controls the agent and the world Jewish West Garry Kasparov operating thanks to the resources of government U.S. funds and grants from sorosovských.
Similarly, in the case of PKB was intense contact with Western response, but significantly affected its communist identity. KAĽAKIN definitely not the person who would RKS however close analogy with AKM and only serves to bring the situation of opposition movements in communist eastern part of Europe. While the AKM is the principal organization, "Spravedlivyj mir" was allowed to write down distorting processes, which comes from the bowels of the top Belarus KGB in dismantling the communist movement. The result is that today in Belarus there is no real communist opposition.
very fact of contacts and the necessary extent tactically conditional cooperation with the Western response can not judge if it is behind it exclusively tactical objectives, or other political survival and not opportunism. It is certainly difficult to operate in conditions of adversity regime in Russia or in Belarus, which, though different in many ways, but united in their consistency in applying their national interests o. i. at the activities of security services aimed at groups of subversion, which is a remnant of the famous Soviet era. A subversion is a vital interest in the real Communists in capitalist society, including in Belarus.
brief summary:
analysis of the nature of the regime in Minsk in relation kv worded introduction to the issues we have reached the following conclusions:
In Belarus - state capitalism - YES, socialism - NO
Lukashenko - Social Democrat and antiimperialista - YES, Communist - NO
In assessing the situation in Belarus was based on its positive and negative aspects, and we believe that closing the eyes from any of them would distort the overall view of it, and hence the choice of administrative action relating thereto.
answers to the questions we are confronted with the main purpose of the Marxist-Leninist movement and interpreted in terms of their achievability of the current socio-political conditions and good election tactics of the revolutionary forces of the proletariat.
0 comments:
Post a Comment